More Details on Motley Fool One Separately Managed Accounts

More Details on Motley Fool One Separately Managed Accounts 4.40/5 (88.00%) 10 votes

Motley Fool One continues to release more information related to their newest Wealth Management feature: Separately Managed Accounts (SMA’s). Recently they revealed minimum portfolio sizes for their SMA counts, as follows:

  • Motley Fool One Everlasting Portfolio: $35,000
  • Supernova Odyssey: $25,000
  • Supernova Phoenix: $35,000
  • Million Dollar Portfolio: $45,000
  • Motley Fool Pro: $300,000

As I’ve stated in the past, given the prices of Motley Fool One, you’d need a portfolio of at least $100,000 for the membership to be worth the cost. So the above are really bare minimums to participate and not practical portfolio sizes. The much larger $300,000 limit for Pro is due to the complexity of the strategies they employ.

You are also able to set up more than one SMA, so you could also allocate some of your account to multiples of the above, subject to the minimums of each.

Members are able to transfer over existing taxable accounts or IRA’s (including Roth IRAs), but not any employer sponsored accounts such as 401k’s. If any of these accounts hold existing stocks that are not part of the portfolio SMA that you will be following, those stocks will automatically be sold. So if you are considering participating in an SMA, make sure you keep this in mind.

And finally, although IRA’s can be accepted, the Motley Fool suggests using taxable accounts, because IRA’s often have contribution limits which could prevent you from following all the trades.

Let me know if you have any additional questions, and I’ll see if I can answer them.


For comprehensive Motley Fool performance results, check out my Performance Insights. They're the only source for Annualized Returns, Success Rates, CAGRs, Performance by Year and Industry

Whether you are already a Motley Fool member, or considering subscribing to one of their services, my Performance Insights will help you with your investing decisions.
 

 

 

{ 10 comments… add one }

  • linda March 29, 2014, 12:13 am

    Very helpful info on the MA’s Your thoughts on subscribing to Everlasting,
    Odyssey, Million Dollar Port and mirroring Pro? Overlap and duplication?
    Thanks Linda

    Reply
    • Kevin March 29, 2014, 3:31 pm

      Linda, there is some overlap with those services in terms of their holdings so you could end up over allocated to a few individual stocks. Style wise, EP and Odyssey are very similar (long term buy hold growth). Personally I think a combo of odyssey and pro could be a good choice Odyssey gives you the growth and pro could provide generally lower risk exposure with less overlap on the holdings as well. I’m just not as close a follower of MDP but their performance is not as strong as SNO and they aren’t as focused on risk management as pro so I just don’t see the benefit vs. the other choices.

      Reply
      • linda March 29, 2014, 3:47 pm

        Thanks Kevin. I value and appreciate your analyses. The only troubling
        feature about pro, as I see it, would be the tax ramifications —-all short term trades. I could be wrong in my analysis.

        Reply
        • Kevin March 29, 2014, 3:57 pm

          That is a valid consideration. But the amount of selling they do is still fairly limited and usually qualifies for long term cap gain treatment.. They aren’t actively trading in and out of positions. So I wouldn’t consider that a major factor.

          Reply
  • Jim April 5, 2014, 12:40 pm

    Kevin: Thanks for the analysis. Considering all the info, it appears an IRA investment in MF’s new SMA program would be “iffy” in your opinion, especially if it is an IRA for retirees and no additional deposits will be made. Given this situation it looks like MF Pro and Supernova Odyssey are not good candidates, leaving only EP, MDP and Supernova Phoenix. Under what conditions would you invest such an IRA in the new SMA program? (Thanks!!)

    Reply
    • Kevin April 5, 2014, 6:12 pm

      Jim, Phoenix seems like the most logical fit since they will be entering a phase of not adding new money, and the portfolio is geared towards retirees and near retirees. EP could also work since they are only buying stocks once per quarter and will hold for at least 5 years, so the trading activity will be limited.

      Reply
  • Robert April 11, 2014, 2:41 pm

    My understanding is that it’s possible to transfer 401k’s into Motley Fool SMA’s. You must be over 59-1/2 and the 401k must allow in-service distributions. Have you heard of anyone doing that?

    Reply
    • Kevin April 15, 2014, 9:24 pm

      Hi Robert – I found this on the Motley Fool SMA FAQ:
      You can use IRAs, including Roth IRAs, unless you choose to follow Motley Fool Pro, which uses shorting and types of options trades that are not supported in IRAs.

      Sorry, but SMAs cannot support 401(k)s or trusts. Motley Fool SMAs are a new product that MFWM is rolling out in phases. Their goal is to offer more account types in the future.

      Reply
  • linda April 27, 2014, 11:14 am

    Kevin for some reason I haven’t been receiving any of your posts on motley fool one I subscribed to Pro and am now considering Million Dollar p ort for
    my IRA. Since MDP consists of the best picks from all of the services, I felt it must be the best investment. What are your thoughts? Thanks

    Reply
    • Kevin April 29, 2014, 9:45 pm

      Linda, try subscribing again via the email subscribe box on the right hand side of the page. Let me know if you are still having issues after that. In terms of MDP, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are picking the best picks, but only that they have the prerogative to pick from those stocks. I don’t follow MDP that closely but the advisor team is pretty strong, and their performance is solid. So not a bad choice if that’s what you are considering.

      Reply

Leave a Comment